Controversy over some VAR Reviews in the quarter-finals

The quarter-finals of the 2026 FIFA World Cup have sparked intense discussion over the use of Video Assistant Referee (VAR), with fans, pundits, and former referees divided over several key decisions.

England vs Norway

England's dramatic 2–1 extra-time victory over Norway was overshadowed by debate over a number of VAR interventions. Norwegian supporters questioned whether England should have been awarded a crucial set-piece in the build-up to one of their goals, while others argued that several physical challenges escaped punishment. Match officials reviewed multiple incidents but ultimately stood by the on-field decisions, leaving many Norway fans frustrated.

Argentina vs Switzerland

Argentina's 3–1 win over Switzerland also generated controversy. Swiss players and supporters believed they were denied important decisions after VAR reviews involving potential fouls and offside situations. While the officials concluded there was no clear and obvious error, the calls fuelled widespread debate across television broadcasts and social media.

A familiar World Cup talking point

The controversies have once again raised questions about the consistency of VAR. While FIFA maintains that the technology is designed to correct clear errors and improve decision-making, critics argue that similar incidents are still being interpreted differently from match to match. Supporters of VAR, however, point to its role in reducing obvious officiating mistakes and ensuring greater fairness.

With the semi-finals approaching—France vs Spain and England vs Argentina—all eyes will once again be on the referees and the VAR team, as even the smallest decision could determine who reaches the 2026 FIFA World Cup final.